After a slow year, the pace of new hedge fund launches is beginning to take off.
"It's a promising environment for new hedge funds," said Alex Ehrlich, the global head of Morgan Stanley's prime services business. "Money is coming in from seasoned investors, many of whom are preparing to redeploy capital."
In 2008, more than twice as many hedge funds liquidated as opened.
Here is a list of some new hedge fund launches in 2009/2010 (also includes established companies launching new funds):
Beacon Light Capital
RoundKeep Capital Advisors
Roc Capital Management
Ambit Capital
QuantZ Capital Management
Theory Capital Management
Flintlock Capital Asset Management
Black River Asset Managment
Van Hulzen Asset Management
Raffi Capital Management
SLP Capital
Esplanade Capital
Sugarloaf Rock Capital
Tidewater Capital
Harrier Hawk Management
Raven Rock Capital
Mudrick Capital
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Number of New Hedge Fund Launches Rises
Hedge Fund Jobs Poised to Recover
Hedge Fund Jobs Poised to Bounce Back after Rough 2009:
After a slow summer, hedge fund jobs are poised to bounce back. This is according to the 2009 Hedge Fund Employment Report.
The report also details a number of other interesting facts about hedge fund jobs:
- Unsurprisingly, New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts are the best states for getting hedge fund jobs.
- Greenwich, Boston, San Francisco, and New York are the best cities for getting hedge fund jobs.
- 2010 should have improved conditions for getting a hedge fund relative to 2009.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Corzine and TPG-Axon - Casino Connection?
New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine's investment in hedge fund TPG-Axon is accused of being a conflict of interest. The charges relate to TPG-Axon's parent, multi billion dollar private equity firm, Texas Pacific Group.

(817) 871-4000 phone
- Dinakar Singh - Founder and CEO
- 31 Employees
Thursday, September 17, 2009
2001 Interview with Madoff Betrayed Fraud
Suspicious 2001 Interview with Madoff
We have often heard that there were a good many financial professionals who were suspicious of Madoff's hedge fund, based on the low volatility and almost complete lack of a month with negative returns. However, in an interview Madoff gave in 2001, there were many clues, certainly in retrospect, that something was amiss.
Here are a few quotes from that article by MarHedge in May of 2001 that are certainly interesting in hindsight:
"Those who question the consistency of the returns, though not necessarily the ability to generate the gross and net returns reported, include current and former traders, other money managers, consultants, quantitative analysts and fund-of-funds executives, many of whom are familiar with the so-called splitstrike conversion strategy used to manage the assets."
"What is striking to most observers is not so much the annual returns—which, though consider somewhat high for the strategy, could be attributed to the firm’s market making and trade execution capabilities—but the ability to provide such smooth returns with so little volatility."
"The best known entity using a similar strategy, a publicly traded mutual fund dating from 1978 called Gateway, has experienced far greater volatility and lower returns during the same period."
"And in a face-to-face interview and several telephone interviews, Madoff sounds and appears genuinely amused by the interest and attention aimed at an asset management strategy designed to generate conservative, low risk returns that he notes are nowhere near the top results of well-known fund managers on an absolute return basis."
"The apparent lack of volatility in the performance of the fund, Madoff says, is an illusion based on a review of the monthly and annual returns. On an intraday, intraweek and intramonth basis, he says, 'the volatility is all over the place,' with the fund down by as much as 1%."
"But as whole, the split-strike conversion strategy is designed to work best in bull markets and, Madoff points out, until recently 'we’ve really been in a bull market since ‘82, so this has been a good period to do this kind of stuff.'"
"As for the specifics of how the firm manages risk and limits the market impact of moving so much capital in and out of positions, Madoff responds first by saying, 'I’m not interested in educating the world on our strategy, and I won’t get into the nuances of how we manage risk.'"
"He won’t reveal how much capital is required to be deployed at any given time to maintain the strategy’s return characteristics, but does say that 'the goal is to be 100% invested.”
"Indeed, says Madoff, the firm itself has received numerous buyout offers but has so far refused any entreaties because he and the many members of his immediate and extended family who work there continue to enjoy what they do and the independence it allows and have no desire to work for someone else."
"Similarly, he adds, another firm could duplicate the strategy in an attempt to get similar results, but its returns would likely be unmatched because 'you need the physical plant and a large operation' to do it with equal success. However, many Wall Street firms, he says, do use the strategy in their proprietary trading activities, but they don’t devote more capital to such operations because their return on capital is better used in other operations."
"Madoff, who believes that he deserves 'some credibility as a trader for 40 years,” says: “The strategy is the strategy and the returns are the returns.' He suggests that those who believe there is something more to it and seeking an answer beyond that are wasting their time."
Those are chilling quotes knowing what we do now.
Read the full article here
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
World's Most Stable Hedge Funds
Below is a list of the most stable hedge funds in the world. The majority of hedge funds meeting the criteria are fixed income / arbitrage funds. The stability rating is based on 5 year returns, 5 year standard deviation of returns, and worst 3 mo. returns. All funds below had positive cumulative 5 year returns and had returns of no worse than -2% in the fund's worst 3 mo. period. Of course, just because a fund has stable, positive returns, does not necessarily indicate it is a safe investment. Recall that Bernard Madoff Securities posted positive monthly returns for 10 straight years with very low volatility. Had Madoff's fund still been active, it would have rated at or near the top of this list.
Most Stable Hedge Funds:
| Fund Name | Firm Name | City | State | Stability Rating | Fund Type |
| Fletcher Income Arbitrage Fund | Fletcher Asset Management | New York | NY | 99.45 | Debt Arbitrage |
| Talisman Partners | Envision Capital Management | Scottsdale | AZ | 99.35 | Distressed Debt |
| Coast Enhanced Income Fund II | Coast Asset Management | Santa Monica | CA | 99.15 | Debt Arbitrage |
| Equity Income Partners | Envision Capital Management | Scottsdale | AZ | 98.91 | Debt/Fixed Income |
| AlphaBridge Fixed Income Fund | AlphaBridge | Greenwich | CT | 98.69 | Fixed Income |
| YA Global Investors | Yorkville Advisors | Jersey City | NJ | 98.22 | Debt Arbitrage |
| FAMA Sniper | FAMA Investors | Grand Cayman | GT | 97.99 | Emerging Markets |
| Kassirer Market Neutral | Toronto | ON | 97.8 | Convertible Arbitrage | |
| DB Equilibria Japan Fund USD | DB Advisors | New York | NY | 97.63 | Absolute Return |
| Glazer Offshore Fund | Glazer Capital Management | New York | NY | 97.38 | Merger Arbitrage |
| Blackthorn Fund | Blackthhorn Group | Overland Park | KS | 97.2 | Multi Strategy |
| Durban Capital | Durban Capital | New York | NY | 97.02 | Equity Arbitrage |
| Loch Capital I | Loch Capital | Boston | MA | 96.84 | Equity |
| Tuscan Investments | Tuscan Group | San Francisco | CA | 96.63 | Equity |
| Winbeldon Fund | Weston Capital | Westport | CT | 96.4 | Global Equity |
| Gabelli Associates | Gabelli | Rye | NY | 96.22 | Equity |
| Blue Rock Capital Fund | Blue Rock Advisors | Minneapolis | MN | 96.05 | Fund of Funds |
| Culross Arbitrage Fund | Culross Global Management | London | UK | 95.83 | Fund of Funds |
| MKP Opportunity Offshore | MKP Capital | New York | NY | 95.64 | Debt Arbitrage |
| Haberman Value Fund | Haberman Capital | New York | NY | 95.45 | Equity |
| AlphaGen Capella Fund Limited | Gartmore Investment Services | Frankfurt | Germany | 95.26 | Equity |
| Mac Sentinel Cdn Managed Yield | Mackenzie Investments | Toronto | ON | 95.01 | Equity Arbitrage |
| Dexia Double Alpha | Dexia Asset Management | Paris | France | 94.81 | Fixed Income |
| Aktie-Ansvar Graal | AktieAnsvar | Stockholm | Sweden | 94.68 | Equity |
| BBVA & Partners Eq Arbitrage | Madrid | Spain | 94.5 | Equity |
The above chart is based on our proprietary formula for hedge fund stability. The formula is based on 5 year returns, 5 year standard deviation of returns, and worst 3 mo. period as well as return/volatility ratio. Stable hedge funds do not necessarily indicate safety of investments. The above figures are subject to error and should not be used for making investment decisions under any circumstances.
The World's Riskiest Hedge Funds
Below is a list of the riskiest hedge funds for the trailing 5 years. Risk ratings are based on a proprietary volatility formula based on 3yr and 5yr standard deviation of returns, as well as the worst 3 month returns. The list of riskiest/most volatile funds includes US as well as Non-US hedge funds. Commodity/Managed Futures and Trend Following hedge funds compose the majority of the riskiest hedge funds due often to the volatility and high correlation of their underlying investments.
Most High-Risk Hedge Funds:
| Fund Name | Firm | City | State | Overal Risk | Fund Type |
| World Grain & Oilseeds Fund | DEC Capital | Lincoln | NE | 99.69 | Commodities |
| CFP IQS Fund | CFP Funds | London | UK | 99.38 | Multi Strategy |
| Fletcher Aggressive Fund | Fletcher Asset Management | New York | NY | 99.06 | Arbitrage |
| Global Partners | Global Partners LP | Chicago | IL | 98.75 | Multi Strategy |
| ICL Managed Account Program | Frontier | Fort Dodge | IA | 98.44 | Trend |
| AIS Futures Fund | AIS Group | Wilton | CT | 98.13 | Leveraged Long/Short |
| Di Tomasso Equilibrium Fund | Di Tomasso Group | Victoria | BC | 97.81 | Commodities |
| Dynamic Power Hedge | Dynamic Funds | Toronto | ON | 97.50 | Equity |
| LSGI Technology Venture | LSGI Advisors Inc | Duncanville | TX | 97.50 | Equity |
| Gerbino Gold Group | The Gerbino Gold Group | Beverly Hills | CA | 96.88 | Commodities |
| Legacy Futures Fund | Hawksbill Capital | Chicago | IL | 96.56 | Managed Futures/Commodities |
| Liberty Global Fund LP | Liberty Funds Group | Dallas | TX | 96.25 | Commodities |
| RAM Aggressive | RAM Futures | New Canaan | CT | 96.25 | Commodities |
| TMS Managed Futures Program | TMS Trade | Houston | TX | 95.63 | FX |
| Fort Orange Capital GL Strategic | Fort Orange Capital Management | Albany | NY | 95.63 | Trend |
| XT-99 Diversified | Pardo Capital | Kenilworth | IL | 95.00 | Trend |
| Permal Media & Technology | Permal Capital | New York | NY | 95.00 | Equity |
| Harmony Capital LTD Class A | Harmony Capital | London | UK | 94.38 | FX |
| Firebird Fund | Firebird Management | New York | NY | 94.06 | Emerging Markets |
| BP Capital Energy Equity | BP Capital | Dallas | TX | 93.75 | Energy |
Overall Risk is determined based on worst 3 mo returns, 3 year standard deviation, and 5 year standard deviation based on funds with 5+ years of available returns. There are many definitions of risk and we have developed this measure simply for informational purposes. High levels of risk does not necessarily indicate a poor investment. Many riskier hedge funds have outperformed their peers in total returns. You should not make any investment decisions based on the above information.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
The Future of Hedge Fund Regulation - US
The Future of Hedge Fund Regulation - US
Summary
Over the last couple of years there has been a lot of political discourse about the need for greater regulation of the financial industry, including hedge funds. Much of the information (and rumors) about possible hedge fund regulation is somewhat contradictory. We will wade through the debate and provide a summary of current proposals for hedge fund regulation in the US and discuss hedge fund regulation in the EU and other countries.
Though it was highly regulated financial institutions that are widely believed to be the cause of the recent financial crisis and subsequent economic malaise, there is talk of regulating hedge funds and private equity firms as well. There have been a huge number of proposals for regulating hedge funds ranging from registration requirements for just the largest to funds, to almost authoritarian regulation for all private money managers. However, the current proposals with the most support appear to be hedge fund registration requirements, without significant additional oversight.
Current Hedge Fund Regulations
Under the existing system hedge funds and private equity firms are far less regulated than mutual funds and other investment vehicles open to the public. Though some hedge funds are registered with the SEC, a couple clauses in the Investment Company Act of 1940 allow must hedge funds to operate without registering with the SEC or any other government agency. Probably fewer than half of all hedge funds are currently registered as investment advisors with the SEC. For funds that are registered, the SEC requires certain filings, but does not provide operational oversight.
The Need for Hedge Fund Regulation
Hedge funds were clearly not the major players in the current financial crisis. However, the $50 billion fraud perpetrated by Bernard Madoff sparked plenty of public outrage and there have been a couple of multi billion dollar hedge fund failures since 2007. Additionally, many politicians still fear another hedge fund collapse ala Long Term Capital Management, the giant hedge fund that collapsed in 1998 and necessitated a Federal Reserve orchestrated bailout.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner voiced his concern in April, "Today, the consequences of (hedge funds') failure is greater. They need to be subject to a higher set of standards.”
Proposals for Regulating Hedge Funds and Recent Developments (2009)
In January 2009, Senators Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Carl Levin (D-Mich.) introduced the Hedge Fund Transparency Act of 2009. The Act would affect funds with more than $50 million in assets (“large firms”). All
funds in excess of $50 million would be required to register with the SEC and maintain books and records according to SEC requirements. It would also require disclosure of including information regarding the identity (including addresses) of the fund’s “beneficial owners,” the amount of the fund’s assets, the fund’s equity structure, affiliations the fund may have with other financial institutions, the minimum investment commitment required of investors, and the total number of investors. The bill did not get to a vote.
In March of 2009, Larry Summers , Director of the National Economic Council for Barack Obama, said the U.S. wants large hedge funds and private-equity firms to be subjected to "rigorous public scrutiny," compared with the minimal oversight they now face. Before joining the Obama Administration, Summers was a Managing Director with one of the worlds largest hedge funds, D.E. Shaw Group.
Then in late April, President Obama lashed out at hedge funds refusing to accept a government offer for Chrysler debt. "A group of investment firms and hedge funds decided to hold out for the prospect of an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout," Obama said, "They were hoping that everybody else would make sacrifices, and they would have to make none. Some demanded twice the return that other lenders were getting. I don't stand with them."
In July, the Obama Administration, released TG-214, a fact sheet with the Administration’s proposals for regulating hedge funds. Funds with more than $30 million would be required to register with the SEC. Once registered funds would be subject to:
• Substantial regulatory reporting requirements with respect to the assets, leverage, and off-balance sheet exposure of their advised private funds
• Disclosure requirements to investors, creditors, and counterparties of their advised private funds
• Strong conflict-of-interest and anti-fraud prohibitions
• Robust SEC examination and enforcement authority and recordkeeping requirements
• Requirements to establish a comprehensive compliance program
The main rationale for the above requirements is to “protect the financial system from systemic risk”
The most recent House of Representatives proposal for hedge fund regulation, from Aug 6, 2009, seems to have lost some of the initial enthusiasm and would regulate hedge funds under less-stringent conditions than banks and lenders. According to House Financial Services Chairman, Barney Frank, “How can you regulate a hedge fund like a mortgage? It doesn’t make any sense. It will be a form appropriate to them.” In apparent moment of bipartisanship, both Democrats and Republicans seem to be in agreement that hedge fund and private equity firms should be more lightly regulated than other traditional financial firms. It should also be noted that hedge fund industry groups spent almost $4 million in lobbying in the first half of 2009.
Hedge Fund Regulation in Europe
Europe has been quicker to attempt hedge fund regulation and proposals there have generally been more severe than in the US. Likewise, hedge funds and private equity firms in the EU have been more vocal in their opposition to regulation than their US counterparts. The most contentious issue in EU hedge fund regulation appears to be an attempt to limit or place caps on the amount of leverage funds can employ. Because of the possibility of regulatory arbitrage, look for the EU and US to finalize regulations that are relatively consistent.
When Will We Get New Hedge Fund Regulations?
Though there are ongoing talks, there is currently no bill for hedge fund regulation in Congress that is likely to pass. It is unlikely any new regulation will be finalized until 2010. Because compliance with new rules could be costly and time consuming, it is conceivable that new hedge fund regulations might not be enforceable until 2011.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Secondary Hedge Fund Market Struggles Continue
The secondary market for hedge fund assets has improved somewhat, but huge discounts to NAV persist.
he average price of secondary hedge fund assets rose for the first time in seven months in April and May 2009. The average discount to NAV fell in half to a still high 10%. After promising signs in April and May, the average discount rose again in June.
“A large proportion of the rise in the average price of sales is due to the trading of funds whose underlying assets are generally liquid and performing well. It is notable that investors now have the confidence to pay a higher price for these assets,” said Elias Tueta, of Hedgebay, the author of the report.
But isn't their something discouraging about discounts of more than 10% for sellers of hedge fund assets considering that many of the underlying funds profit on intraday moves of fractions of a percent? Of course, some discount is rational to account for the illiquidity the buyer takes on.
A secondary market for hedge fund assets would provide hedge fund investors an opportunity to dispose of their interests in a fund to a qualified buyer, without having to meet the actual hedge fund's redemption requirements.
Hedge Fund Atticus Capital to Close Flagship Fund
Atticus Capital announced today it will return $3 billion to investors from two funds, including its flagship hedge fund, the Atticus Global Fund. The fund has not performed well over the last couple years. The Atticus Global Fund was down 25% in 2008 and 9% in 2009 YTD.
As recently as 2007, Atticus Capital had $3.7 billion in assets under management (AUM).
According to Atticus founder, Timothy Barakett, the move was for personal reasons and not in response to investor redemptions.
The $1.2 billion dollar Atticus European Fund will remain open.
Atticus Capital typically employs a merger arbitrage and risk arbitrage, as well as event driven strategies and was founded in 1995 by Timothy Barakett at the age of 29. Atticus is based in New York with an additional office in London.
Contact info for Atticus Capital:
Atticus Capital
767 5th Avenue
New York, NY 10153
Phone: 212-256-8000
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Worst Performing Hedge Fund Strategies 2009 (YTD)
The worst performing hedge fund sectors for YTD (through June 30, 2009):
#1. Short Biased -5.20%
#2. Market Neutral +4.74%
#3. Europe +5.02%
#4. Merger Arbitrage ++5.33%
Source: Hennessee Group
Note that all hedge fund strategies, with the exception of short biased, outperformed the Dow and S&P500.
Best Performing Hedge Fund Sectors of 2009 (YTD)
The best performing hedge fund sectors for YTD (through June 30, 2009):
#1. Latin America (LATAM) +26.05%
#2. Convertible Arbitrage +21.48%
#3. Distressed +17.16%
#4. Multiple Arbitrage +16.20%
Source: Hennessee Group
Interestingly, only the top 3 hedge fund strategies above even beat the NASDAQ's 16.36% return YTD.
Overall, the index is up 11.74% through the first half of the year, beating all the major US equity indeces, except for the NASDAQ.
50 Largest US Hedge Funds (AUM)
Below is a list of the Top 50 US Hedge Funds including location, strategy and AUM, ranked by Assets Under Management for 2009:
TOP 50 US HEDGE FUNDS
1. Bridgewater Associates
Location: Westport, CT
Strategy: Multi Strategy, Global Macro
AUM: $38.00 billion
2. JPMorgan Asset Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Long/Short Equity
AUM: $32.89 billion
3. Paulson & Co.
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Credit, Multi Strategy, Merger Arbitrage
AUM: $29.00 billion
4. D.E. Shaw & Company
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Multi Strategy, Global Macro
AUM: $28.60 billion
5. Och-Ziff Capital Management
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $22.10 billion
6. Soros Fund Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Global Macro
AUM: $21.00 billion
7. Goldman Sachs Asset Management
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $20.59 billion
8. Renaissance Technologies Corporation
Location: East Setauket, NY
Strategy: Quantitative Long/Short Equity
AUM: $20.00 billion
9. Farallon Capital Management
Location: San Francisco, CA
Strategy: Multi Strategy
AUM: $20.00 billion
10. Baupost Group
Location: Boston, MA
AUM: $16.80 billion
11. Moore Capital Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Global Macro, Fixed Income, Long/Short Equity
AUM: $16.50 billion
12. Avenue Capital Group
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Distressed Debt
AUM: $16.20 billion
13. King Street Capital Management
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $15.90 billion
14. Angelo, Gordon & Company
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Multi strategy
AUM: $14.00 billion
15. Fortress Investment Group
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Global Macro, Event Driven
AUM: $13.66 billion
16. Lone Pine Capital
Location: Greenwich, CT
Strategy: Long/Short Equity
AUM: $13.00 billion
17 . Elliott Management Corporation
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $12.80 billion
18. Eton Park Capital
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Multi Strategy
AUM: $12.00 billion
19. SAC Capital Advisors
Location: Stamford, CT
AUM: $12.00 billion
20. Cerberus Capital Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Distressed Debt
AUM: $11.90 billion
21. FX Concepts
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Emerging Market Debt
AUM: $11.74 billion
22. Millenium Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Multi Strategy
AUM: $11.70 billion
23. Tudor Investment Corporation
Location: Greenwich, CT
Strategy: Long/Short Equity, Global Macro
AUM: $11.37 billion
24. Citadel Investment Group
Location: Chicago, IL
Strategy: Multi Strategy
AUM: $10.72 billion
25. TPG-Axon Capital Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Global Macro
AUM: $10.60 billion
26. ESL Investments
Location: Greenwich, CT
AUM: $10.50 billion
27. Duquesne Capital Management
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Strategy: Distressed Debt, Multi Strategy
AUM: $10.00 billion
28. Wellington Capital Management
Location: Boston, MA
AUM: $10.00 billion
29. GoldenTree Asset Management
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $10.00 billion
30. Davidson Kempner Capital Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Distress Debt, Long/Short Equity, Multi Strategy
AUM: $9.70 billion
31. Maverick Capital
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Long/Short Equity
AUM: $9.70 billion
32. Viking Global Investors
Location: Greenwich, CT
AUM: $9.66 billion
33. Canyon Capital Advisors
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Strategy: Arbitrage
AUM: $9.38 billion
34. GMO
Location: Boston, MA
AUM: $9.00 billion
35. Bain Capital
Location: Boston, MA
AUM: $8.80 billion
36. Stark Investments
Location: St. Francis, WI
Strategy: Multi Strategy, Emerging Markets
AUM: $8.67 billion
37. Convexity Capital Management
Location: Boston, MA
AUM: $8.50 billion
38. QVT Financial
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Multi Strategy
AUM: $8.50 billion
39. Perry Capital
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Multi Strategy
AUM: $8.33 billion
40. Adage Capital Management
Location: Boston, MA
AUM: $8.00 billion
41. Caxton Associates
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $8.00 billion
42. Atticus Capital
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Activist
AUM: $8.00 billion
43. York Capital Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Event Driven, Distressed Debt, Multi Strategy
AUM: $7.80 billion
44. Highfields Capital Management
Location: Boston, MA
AUM: $7.80 billion
45. Black River Asset Management
Location: Minnetonka, MN
Strategy: Multi Strategy
AUM: $7.44 billion
46. Harbinger Capital Partners
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $7.10 billion
47. Taconic Capital Advisors
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $7.10 billion
48. Magnetar Capital
Location: New York, NY
AUM: $7.10 billion
49. HBK Capital Management
Location: Dallas, TX
Strategy: Multi Strategy
AUM: $7.10 billion
50. Marathon Asset Management
Location: New York, NY
Strategy: Emerging Markets, Long/Short Equity, Event Driven, Distressed Debt
AUM: $7.00 billion
Source: Institutional Investor
Also, see the list of the Top 100 Largest Hedge Funds in the World
